| Architecture | Your team has complete design freedom, but must work through tenancy, permissions, auditing, events, integrations and operational concerns itself. Important mistakes may only become visible after the system is in use. | The principal has designed a scalable system with a production-proven multi-tenant architecture. The remaining risk is whether the approach fits your particular system, which we assess before committing to the build. |
|---|
| People | You develop the capability internally, but may need to recruit experienced backend and platform engineers or divert them from work already on your roadmap. | You can begin with relevant experience already available, without first committing to long-term hiring. The trade-off is a dependency on a specialist supplier. |
|---|
| Delivery | Delivery can be fast if the right team is already available. Otherwise recruitment, architecture and foundational engineering delay the business-specific work. | The common API surface can be running early because the foundations already exist. Custom rules, integrations and workflows still affect the complete delivery time. |
|---|
| Cost | Existing salaries can make the work appear inexpensive, but the real cost includes opportunity cost, maintenance, operational ownership and possible rework. | There is a visible upfront cost, followed by separately identified costs for support, operations and further development. It is most likely to be economically attractive when the alternative is assembling or redirecting equivalent specialist capability. |
|---|
| Fit and flexibility | Your team can design without framework constraints, provided it has the time and experience required. | The foundation is deliberately opinionated and best suited to relational, multi-tenant business systems. Discovery establishes whether it fits; sometimes building internally or choosing another platform will be the better answer. |
|---|
| Control and dependency | You control the application source, but still depend on employees, open-source and commercial packages, cloud services and retained internal knowledge. | You control the AWS account, infrastructure, data and application-specific source. The underlying CustomAPIs library remains proprietary, but the licensed version runs in your account and does not depend on a hosted service operated by us. |
|---|
| Continuity | Supplier failure is avoided, but staff turnover, key-person dependency and loss of internal knowledge remain risks. | Your perpetual licence allows the delivered system to continue running and be redeployed without support. Framework patches and upgrades remain dependent on CustomAPIs. |
|---|
| Operations | Your team owns monitoring, deployments, backups, incidents, security maintenance and capacity planning. | Your team can operate the system, or managed operations can be separately scoped. Responsibilities, response coverage and price are agreed explicitly. |
|---|
| Scale and performance | The system can be tailored precisely to the expected workload, but your team must design, test and operate the scaling strategy. | The system starts with a modest AWS footprint and known application and database scaling levers. Performance requirements still need to be established and tested, and higher traffic or resilience requirements increase infrastructure and operating cost. |
|---|